Skip to content

How our content is prepared

Source selection, preparer and reviewer roles, check dates, revisions and the corrections process.

Who it is for
All readers
Limits of this section
Only the process actually followed is described; no board, specialism or accreditation that does not exist is claimed.

Process

Source selection

Text
Priority is given to current guidelines, systematic reviews, official health and research bodies, and primary studies that directly support a claim. A single study is not presented as definitive.
Content approval status
Beyaz approval · 18 October 2026

Preparation and review

Text
Drafts are prepared with sources; Beyaz Yıldırım approves Turkish and English text separately. Material requiring legal or specialist review is not published without that review.
Content approval status
Beyaz approval · 18 October 2026

Review date

Text
The last review date for source links and key claims is recorded with the content. The date does not mean the information will remain current indefinitely.
Content approval status
Beyaz approval · 18 October 2026

Revision

Text
Content is reviewed when new guidance, important evidence, changed service information or a clarity problem is identified; changes are recorded as a new version.
Content approval status
Beyaz approval · 18 October 2026

Corrections

Text
When a factual error is confirmed, the text is corrected and the subject, date and related version are recorded. Readers may report source or wording errors through contact channels and are asked not to send health information.
Content approval status
Beyaz approval · 18 October 2026

General information, not diagnosis or personal advice.

← Home